And Civil Liberties Study Guide Answers

On
And Civil Liberties Study Guide Answers Rating: 3,5/5 409 reviews

Study Guide: Civil Liberties and Civil Rights 12-13 Date Due Assignments When using the links below, if you are asked for a password use vopsoal Mon 4/8 Tue 4/9 Wed 4/10 Thu 4/11 Fri 4/12 Mon 4/15 1. Read The Necessity of a Bill of Rights? Federalist vs. Antifederalist No. 84 History 404: US Constitution Seminar 2. 95-109 (Due Process) 3.

AP Unit 2 Study Guide: Civil Liberties and Civil Rights. Time Frame: September 20- October 14 (Tentative). Due: At end of unit. Readings: Wilson & Dilulio:.

Read the Edline handout on incorporation doctrine and take margin notes clarifying the concept of incorporation in your own words 1. DisplayGroupName=Reference&disableHighlighting=false&prodId=UHIC&action=e& windowstate=normal&catId=&documentId=GALE%7CCX&mode=view&userGroupName=bergenchs&jsid=efa34a7a178 5dadbb41e26 2. DisplayGroupName=PrimarySources&disableHighlighting=false&prodId=UHIC&actio n=e&windowstate=normal&catId=&documentId=GALE%7CCX&mode=view&userGroupName=bergenchs&jsid=e9b7970961 28e4fe75d6ab5dfb31803f 3. Questions 1-5 Civil Liberties BRING A PACK OF 4x5 INDEX CARDS TO CLASS Make flashcards on the cases assigned in class.

Examples

On one side put the name of the case and the date. On the other put a short summary of the facts involved and then describe the issues in question. Indicate the decision and the civil liberties implications of each decision. Read SYSTEM UNDER STRESS (Lanahan p360) 2. Read handout on Law of Indecency on EDLINE make marginal notes and be prepared to discuss w reference to cases 3.

Read pp109-119 4. Read EDLINE on Due process; make marginal notes and be prepared to discuss w reference to cases; 5. Continue flash cards on cases; by end of class have all complete for all THRU Due Process 1. FRQ CIVIL LIBERTIES Civil Liberties test on EDLINE tonight Complete by Monday 7am Read p. 121-149 Read RIGHTS TALK (Lanahan p405 Answer questions 1 – 10 from Civil Rights Complete Flash cards on Equal protection for Women and Minorities Complete test Civil Rights posted on EDLINE by 8am MONDAY USE THIS SITE TO MAKE FLASHCARDS ON LINE Flashcards: The world's largest online library of printable flash cards Chapter 5: Reading Questions 1. What are the three reasons why the liberties claimed by some people become major issues? List and explain the examples the book gives when war has resulted in the limiting of civil liberties.

And Civil Liberties Study Guide Answers

Explain briefly how the Supreme Court has interpreted the Free Exercise and Establishment clauses. List and explain the circumstances when the Supreme Court has ruled that freedom of speech may be limited. Define the “clear-and-present-danger test,” libel, preferred position, prior restraint, imminent danger, and symbolic speech 6. Summarize the Supreme Court’s changing interpretations of how to protect both the due process rights of accused criminals and to preserve the safety of the community. Make sure you know what the exclusionary rule and the “good faith exception” are.

Chapter 5 Civil Liberties Terms to Know 1. Civil Liberties Entrepreneurial politics McCarthyism Bill of Rights Incorporation Doctrine Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Selective Incorporation Establishment Clause 20. Free Exercise Clause Wall of Separation Principle Lemon Test Parochial Schools School Vouchers Equal Access 29. “Bad Tendency” test Symbolic Speech “Hate Crime” Speech codes Prior Restraint Libel “actual malice” Obscenity “Community standards” “Prurient interests” Preferred position Imminent danger Neutrality and Clarity Least-restrictive means John Peter Zenger 39. Right to assemble Right to associate equal access “balancing Test” “preferred freedoms” Search warrant Indictment Grand Jury Substantive due process 48.

Procedural due process Probably cause Exclusionary rule “fruit of the poison tree” “good faith” exception Miranda rights 16. Religious Freedom Restoration Act Freedom of Expression Oliver Wendell Holmes “Clear and Present Danger” 35.

Pentagon Papers 54. Capital Punishment 36. Libel Slander Commercial speech 55. Self-incrimination Equal protection clause Due process clause CIVIL LIBERTIES CROSSWORD PUZZLE.html Chapter 6: Reading Questions CIVIL RIGHTS– Type your answers. What does the book say is the pertinent question regarding civil rights? What were the strategies that black leaders followed in order to obtain civil rights? Once basic rights such as voting and integration had been obtained, what issues did civil rights leaders focus on?

Briefly outline the steps in the NAACP’s strategy in the fight against segregated schools and indicate the success they had in the courts and in implementing desegregation. What was the issue concerning desegregation vs.

How has this issue been resolved? What were the four developments that made it possible to pass civil rights bills? What accounts for the change in attitude in Congress towards civil rights issues from the 1960s to the present? How has the Supreme Court changed in its attitudes towards equal rights for women from the early 20th century to today? What are the two standards the Court uses today to in considering sex discrimination cases? Briefly summarize the highlights of the government’s response to abortion. What is the debate between those who support “equality of result” and those who support “equality of opportunity”?

How did activists for the disabled manage to get The Americans with Disabilities Act passed? Briefly summarize what is included in the law and the objections that some have had to the law. What are the criteria that the Supreme Court has adapted in defining strict scrutiny of any law involving racial preferences? Chapter 6 – Civil Rights Terms to Know 1. Civil Rights Suspect classifications Strict Scrutiny Jim Crow laws 15. “equal protections of the laws” “separate but equal” 19. “with all deliberate speed” 21.

Equal Pay Act of 1963 Civil Rights Act of 1964 Voting Rights Act of 1965 Open Housing Act of 1968 (Title VIII) Higher Education Act of 1972 (Title IX) Education of All Handicapped Children Act of 1975) Voting Rights Act of 1982 29. Right to privacy Hyde Amendment Affirmative Action Reverse discrimination 33. “Equality of opportunity: 34.

“Equality of result” 35. Quotas and preferences 8. Segregation Desegregation 22. Integration 24.

De jure segregation 25. De facto segregation 13. Civil disobedience 26. Civil Rights Act of 1957 Civil Rights Act of 1988 American with Disabilities Act of 1990 Civil Rights and Women’s Equity in Employment Act of 1991 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 Sexual harassment Equal Employment Opportunities Commission Equal Rights Amendment 36. Compensatory action “compelling government interest” “narrowly tailored” 41.

Concurring opinion 42. Dissenting opinion “comparable worth” 37. Supreme Court Cases for this unit Incorporation Barron v. Baltimore (1833) 1.Gitlow v. New York (1925) 2 Near v. Minnesota (1931) 3 Palko v.

Connecticut (1937) 4.Everson v. Board of Education (1942) 5 Freedom of Religion.Everson v.

Board of Education (1942) 6 Engel v. Vitale (1962) 7.Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971) 8 Wallace v.

Jaffree (1985) 9 Westside Community Schools v. Mergens (1990) 10 Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe (2000) 11 Zelman v. Simmons-Harris (2002) 12 Ten Commandments cases: McCreary County, KY v. American Civil Liberties Union of Kentucky and Van Orden v.

Perry (2005) 13 Freedom of Speech and Press.Schenk v. United States (1919) 14.Gitlow v. New York (1925) 15.Near v. Minnesota (1931) 16 New York Times Co.

Sullivan (1964) 1.Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District (1969) 2 New York Times Co. (1971) 3 Miller v. California (1973) 4 Bethel School District No. Fraser (1986) 5 Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier (1988) 6 Texas v.

Johnson (1989) 7 Reno v. ACLU (1997) 8 Freedom of Assembly and Petition.NAACP v.

Alabama (1958) Boy Scouts of American v. Dale (2000) Due Process and the Rights of the Accused.Mapp v. Ohio (1961) 9.Gideon v. Wainwright (1963) 10.Miranda v.

Arizona (1966) 11 Furman v. Georgia (1972) 12 Gregg v. Georgia (1976) 13 New Jersey v. T.L.O (1985) 14 Equal Protection of the Laws – Minorities Civil Rights Cases (1883) 15.Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) 16.Korematsu v. United States (1944) 1.Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954) 2.Regents of the University of California v.

Bakke (1978) 3 Lawrence v. Texas (2003) 4 Grutter v. Bollinger (2003) and Gratz v. Bollinger (2003) 5 Equal Protection of the Laws – Women.Griswold v.

Connecticut (1965) Reed v. Reed (1971).Roe v. Wade (1973) Webster v. Reproductive Health Services (1989) Planned Parenthood v.

Casey (1992) Right to Die Cruzan v. Missouri (1990). indicates you should know this case by name. It is sufficient to know them by their shorthand name such as Plessy or Bakke.

For the other cases, knowing them by name would be ideal, but is not required. The important task is to understand the cases and their ramifications.

Definition: a judicial doctrine where most of the protections found in the Bill of Rights are made applicable to the states through the 14th Amendment significance: Requires states to respect freedoms of press, speech, assembly, among other rights. Guarantees in the 2nd, 3rd and 7th Amendment have not been incorporated.

The rationale for selective incorporation is Palko v Connecticut (1937). They chose not to bind states to the 5th Amendment's double jeopardy clause and concluded that protection from double jeopardy was not a fundamental freedom.

What Are My Civil Liberties

Definition: a judicial doctrine where most of the protections found in the Bill of Rights are made applicable to the states through the 14th Amendment significance: Requires states to respect freedoms of press, speech, assembly, among other rights. Guarantees in the 2nd, 3rd and 7th Amendment have not been incorporated.

The rationale for selective incorporation is Palko v Connecticut (1937). They chose not to bind states to the 5th Amendment's double jeopardy clause and concluded that protection from double jeopardy was not a fundamental freedom. Definition: Words 'by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of peace and are not subject to the restrictions of the 1st Amendment significance: Discussed in the 1942 court case Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire. Words that include 'profanity, obscenity, and threats' are able to be regulated by the federal and state govts. Theses words include symbolic expression. For Example, Paul Cohen wore a jacket that said '.

the Draft. Stop the War' and was arrested and charged. 2002 chevy blazer service manual. Definition: The english common law test of what was obscene: 'Whether the tendency of the matter charged as obscenity is to deprive and corrupt those whose minds are open to such immoral influences and into whose hands a publication of this sort might fall.' Significance: In Roth v. To be considered obscene the material in question had to be 'utterly without social importance' and made a new test for obscenity- 'whether to the average person, applying contemporary community standards, the dominant theme of the material taken as a whole appeals to the prurient interests'. Definition: Being tried twice in court significance: In Palko v.

And Civil Liberties Study Guide Answers

Full List Of Civil Liberties

Connecticut (1937) Palko was retried and found guilty of first degree murder and sentenced to death. But he argued it violated with the 5th Amendment's prohibition against double jeopardy because the 5th Amendment was applicable to the states according to the due process clause of the 14th Amendment.The Supreme court chose not to bind states to the 5th Amendment's double jeopardy clause and concluded that double jeopardy was not a fundamental freedom. Definition: Protects people from unreasonable searches and seizures by the federal government. The police are allowed to search when 1) the person arrested 2) things in plain view of the accused person 3) places or things that the arrested person could touch or reach or are in the arrestees control.

Civil Liberties Issues Today

Significance: In Chandler v. Miller (1997) the Supreme court didn't allowed Georgia to require all candidates for office to pass a urinalysis test 30 days before nominations concluding that it violated the search and seizure clause.